Mitsubishi A6M
Zero Fighter
A6M1
The Mitsubishi
A6M Zero Fighter was the finest
shipboard fighter in the world during the first year of the Pacific War. It was the first shipboard fighter capable
of defeating its land-based opponents.
Its world-wide fame was won in a series of astounding victories against
all types of land-based and
carrier-based Allied aircraft during the first six months after Pearl Harbor. It took part in every
major action in which the Japanese Navy
was involved, from Pearl Harbor all the way to the final B-29 assault on Japan. It became a legend in its own time
for its extremely good maneuverability
and its exceptionally long range. Even today, the Zero remains for the
Japanese and their erstwhile enemies
alike the symbol of Japanese air power during
the Pacific War. Despite the fact that it was largely obsolescent
by mid-1943, it remained in production
until the end of the war. More Zeros were built than any other type of Japanese aircraft, a total of 10,449 being
built at Mitsubishi and Nakajima
factories.
In 1937, the
Japanese Navy had just introduced the Navy Type 96 Carrier Fighter (Mitsubishi A5M, later known to the Allies under
the code name CLAUDE) into service, but they were already looking to
design its successor. On May 19, 1937,
preliminary specifications for a Navy
Experimental 12-Shi Carrier Fighter were submitted to both Mitsubishi
and Nakajima. The number 12 indicated
that the specification had been issued in the
twelfth year of Showa, as the reign of Emperor Hirohito was known.
The Mitsubishi
Jukogyu K.K. (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Co Ltd) was a highly-integrated conglomerate of shipbuilding, airframe and
engine manufacturing plants, with facilities located in a dozen different locations in Japan. A team led by chief
engineer Jiro Horikoshi was assigned by
Mitsubishi to work on the project.
In October
1937, in light of combat reports coming from China, the Japanese Navy issued a revised set of
specifications. These called for a maximum
speed of 310 mph at 13,100 feet, a climb to 9800 feet in 3.5 minutes,
an endurance of 1.5-2.0 hours at normal
rated power or 6 to 8 hours at economical
cruising speed, and an armament of two 20-mm cannon and two 7.7-mm
machine guns. A complete set of radio
equipment had to be carried, including a radio
direction finder. The maneuverability had to be at least the equal of
the Mitsubishi A5M.
Nakajima
thought these requirements to be completely unrealistic and pulled out of the competition on January 17,
1938. This left Mitsubish alone to try
and meet the requirements of the 12-Shi project.
The design team
headed by Jiro Horikoshi came up with a cantilever low-winged monoplane with a fully-retractable landing gear. The
pilot was housed underneath a large
transparent canopy with an excellent view both forward and aft. It was powered by a Mitsubishi Zuisei 13
(Auspicious Star) fourteen-cylinder,
twin-row air-cooled radial engine, rated at 780 hp for takeoff and 875
hp at 11,810 feet. This engine was
later known under the unified JNAF/JAAF designation scheme as the Ha.31/13. This engine was selected because of its
light weight and small diameter, even
though Horikoshi had actually favored the more powerful Mitsubishi Kinsei 46.
The engine was to drive a two-bladed
variable-pitch propeller.
Careful
attention was paid to weight savings, and a new special aluminum alloy developed by Sumimoto was
adopted.
The mockup was
inspected on April 17 and July 11, 1938, and changes recommended were
progressively incorporated into the design.
The first prototype
was completed on March 16, 1939 at Mitsubishi's Nagoya plant. It was armed with two 7.7 mm Type 97 machine guns
in the upper fuselage decking and two
wing-mounted 20-mm Type 99 cannon. The aircraft was transferred to the Army's training airfield at Kagamigahara for
flight testing. The aircraft took off
on its first test flight on April 1, 1939 with test pilot Katsuzo Shima at the controls. The test was
highly successful, the only problems noted
being with the wheel brakes, the oil system and a slight tendency to
vibrate. During the flight test
program, the two-bladed variable-pitch propeller was replaced by a three-bladed constant speed propeller in an attempt
to correct the vibration problem.
The prototype
was accepted by the Navy on September 14, 1939 as the A6M1 Carrier Fighter. In the meantime, a second prototype was
completed and passed its manufacturer's
flight tests on October 18, 1939, and was delivered to the Navy one week later.
A6M2
The speed of
the A6M1 was 305 mph at 12,470 feet,
which was slightly below the requirement, so on May 1, 1939, the Navy ordered Mitsubishi to install the
Nakajima NK1C Sakae 12 (Prosperity)
engine in the third prototype and subsequent aircraft. The Sakae 12
(Ha.35/12) engine was also a fourteen-cylinder
twin-row air-cooled radial and was only
slightly larger and heavier than the Zuisei despite its higher power.
Mitsubishi was somewhat reluctant to do
this, since the Sakae engine was a competitor's product.
The re-engined
aircraft was designated A6M2. The first Sakae-powered A6M2 began flight testing on December 28, 1939. The aircraft's
performance exceeded the Navy's most
optimistic expectation, amply exceeding the original performance requirements which had been thought to be impossible only
a few months earlier. Production of an
initial service test batch of A6M2s began, and initial flight trials were completed in July of
1940. On July 31, the aircraft was
formally accepted for production as the Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter
Model 11. The popular name was Reisen
(which was an abbreviation for Rei Sentoki, or Zero Fighter), so chosen for its type number which was 0, standing for
the last digit of the current Japanese
year, which was 2600 in the Japanese calendar.
On July 21,
1940 the Japanese Navy decided to assign 15
pre-production A6M2s to the 12th Rengo Kokutai (12th Combined Naval Air
Corps) for combat trials in China. In
China, the A6M2 entered combat for the first time on August 19, 1940, when 12 A6M2s escorted 50 G3M2
bombers in a bombing raid over Chungking,
but no enemy fighters were encountered. The Zero Fighter drew first
blood on September 13, 1940 when
thirteen A6M2s led by Lt Saburo Shindo attacked a force of 27 Chinese-piloted Polikarkpov I-15s and
I-16s, shooting down all the Chinese
aircraft with no Japanese losses. The pre-production Zero Fighters were later joined by the initial production
A6M2s. In the next few months, they
destroyed 99 Chinese aircraft for the loss of only two of their own to
ground fire.
After over a
year of use in China not one Reisen had been captured or inspected by either Chinese or American
observers. Claire E. Chennault, who was
a retired USAAC officer attempting to reorganize the demoralized Chinese air force, took note of this new Japanese
fighter and attempted to warn the USAAF
of the Zero's capabilities, but his warning was ignored and the Zero remained largely unknown in the West.
The second A6M1
crashed on March 11, 1940 when it disintegrated in midair during a test flight, the pilot being killed. Although the
actual cause of this accident was never
fully determined, it was thought that a wing spar might have failed. Consequently, beginning with the 22nd A6M2, a
reinforcement of the rear wing spar was
introduced.
Beginning with
the 65th aircraft, manually upward-folding wingtips (about 20 inches long) were incorporated so that the Reisen could
fit the deck elevators of the Imperial
Navy's aircraft carriers. This modification resulted in a change of designation to Navy Type 0
Carrier Fighter Model 21.
The next
modification affected the aileron tab balance. Beginning with the 128th Reisen, the aileron tab
balance was linked to the landing gear
retraction mechanism to improve high-speed control by reducing stick
forces.
In order to
correct an aileron flutter problem, a modified aileron tab balance was incorporated on the 192nd
and subsequent A6M2.
In November
1941 the Nakajima Hikoki K.K. was instructed to begin producing the Model 21 at its Koizumi plant. This must have been
especially irritating for the Nakajima
company, since less than three years earlier it had thought that the Zero Fighter had been impossible to
design.
When the
Pacific War began on December 7, 1941, The Japanese Navy had over four hundred Zeros in service, most of
them Model 21s. At Pearl Harbor, Zero
Fighters flying off the carriers escorted the B5N2 torpedo bombers and D3A1 dive bombers in the first strike, and
they strafed military airfields,
anti-aircraft positions, and other ground installations. The Zeros
caused considerable havoc on the ground
at Pearl Harbor, while destroying four US aircraft in the air. Eight A6M2 fighters were lost during
the raid, most of them to anti-aircraft
fire.
During the
first year of the Pacific War, the standard shipboard fighter serving with the US Navy was the Grumman F4F Wildcat. The
A6M2 was superior to the F4F Wildcat in
speed, climb rate, and maneuverability, but the Wildcat had better firepower and was more robust. In a dive the
two aircraft were fairly equal, but the
turning circle of the Zero Fighter was very much smaller than that of the Wildcat by virtue of its
lower wing loadings.
In the first
Japanese attack on Wake Island on December 8, eight Wildcats were destroyed on the ground. The remaining Wildcats
fought courageously for two weeks,
breaking up a number of air attacks and turning back one seaborne invasion attempt. However, they were
overwhelmed by superior Japanese forces
and the last two Wildcats were destroyed on December 22.
By the time of
the Battle of Midway in June 1942, Wildcat pilots had evolved tactics to deal with the superior performance of the
Zero. One of these was the "Thatch
Weave", named for LtCmdr John S. Thatch, commander of VF-3. In this maneuver, two Wildcats would
criss-cross back and forth, each one
alternately covering the other's tail. Whenever possible Wildcat pilots
tried to get above their opponents, so
that they could then dive through the enemy
formation in a firing pass, continuing their dive until they were able
to zoom-climb back up to a favorable
altitude for another attack. Efforts were made to avoid close-in dogfights, where the Zero clearly
had the advantage.
The initial
attack on the Philippines was staged by bombers and fighters based in southern Formosa. The range performance of the
Zero was such that the attacking planes
must have come from aircraft carriers. On December 8, 54 G4M1s and 54 G3M2s escorted by 84 A6M2s staged a raid on Clark
Field. Even though Pearl Harbor had
been attacked the day before, the American aircraft were still not yet dispersed and few American fighters were up in
the air. Total surprise was achieved
and 15 US aircraft were destroyed in the air and fifty aircraft destroyed on the ground, essentially
crippling US air power in the
Philippines in a single day. The first US aircraft shot down over the
Philippines was a Curtiss P-40,
destroyed that day by a Zero flown by Petty Officer Saboro Sakai. This was his third kill, Sakai having
gotten two aircraft in China. Sakai
show down the first B-17 two days later. By December 13, the US air forces were essentially gone, and the A6M2s
reverted to strafing and ground support.
The Zero had established air superiority in only three days.
The Zero Fighter
achieved perhaps its greatest success in the Duch East Indies campaign. In about three months, a force of 200 A6M2s
defeated all comers, including Brewster
Model 339 Buffaloes, Curtiss-Wright CW-21Bs,
Curtiss Hawk 75A-7s, and Curtiss P-40s that were thrown against it by
the Dutch, British, American, and
Australian forces. These fighters were no match for the Reisens, and on March 8, 1942 the Dutch were forced to
capitulate.
The Zeros then
turned towards New Guinea and the Solomons. During this campaign, the Reisen consistently mastered the Curtiss P-40s
and the Bell P-39s and P-400s that the
Allies threw against them. The Airacobra was no match for the Zero in air-to-air combat, and Saburo Sakai
regarded the P-39 as a relatively easy "kill" for a pilot of any
experience.
The only bright
spot during these dark days was the American
Volunteer Group (AVG), better known as the Flying Tigers. They were
first in battle on December 20, 1941
during a Japanese raid on Kunming. The P-40s flown by the AVG were faster than the Zero in level flight,
but were much less maneuverable. It was
soon concluded that it was suicide to try and out-maneuver a Zero, and AVG pilots found that they were able to take
advantage of the superior diving speed
and ruggedness of their P-40s. The tactics that most often achieved success were to first make sure the P-40s
had a height advantage, dive down on the
Zeroes, shoot, and then run as fast as you could. By the time that the
AVG was absorbed into the 14th Air
Force in early July of 1942, they had been credited with 286 Japanese aircraft destroyed in the air as against 13
pilots killed in aerial action
The Zero
Fighter was given the code name ZEKE by Capt Frank McCoy's air intelligence team in July of
1942. However, faulty identification
and lack of cooperation between various intelligence officers in the CBI
theatre resulted in duplicate names
being assigned to the Zero Fighter, namely BEN and RAY. However, these were soon dropped in favor of ZEKE.
Nevertheless, since the Reisen's official Japanese designation was known by the Allies quite early in the war, the ZEKE
code name was not often used, and the
Reisen was still referred to as the Zero by Allied pilots who were still trying to figure out a counter for
this outstanding warplane.
In June of
1942, a Japanese task force launched a strike against the Aleutians in an
attempt to draw American forces away from the intended target of Midway. On June 3, Petty Officer
Tadayoshi Koga flying from the aircraft
carrier Ryujo took off in his A6M2 for an inconclusive strike
against Dutch Harbor. On the way back
to his carrier, he found that a couple of bullet holes had pierced his fuel tanks, and told his commanding officer
that he intended to attempt an
emergency landing on the bleak marshes of Akutan Island. Unfortunately, the
plane flipped over on its back during the landing. Although the aircraft was only slightly damaged, Petty Officer Koga's
neck was broken and he was killed. Five
weeks later an American naval scouting party found the Japanese fighter upside down in the marsh, the pilot still
hanging dead in his straps.
Petty Officer
Koga's A6M2 was only slightly damaged, and was packed up and shipped back to the USA. This was one of the greatest
intelligence finds of the Pacific War,
since it enabled American intelligence to make a detailed study of the Zero which was still running
wild all throughout the Pacific. Koga's
Zero was repaired and reflown, and went through an exhaustive series of
tests in order to gain information
about its strengths and weaknesses. The tests
revealed the fighter's faults and finally shattered the aura of myth
which had surrounded it.
Information from
these tests in the United States was quickly passed along to operational units in the Pacific which were able to
improve their tactics against the
nimble Zero which had ruled the Pacific skies for the first six months of the Pacific War. The tests confirmed
that the Zero Fighter had an excellent
climb rate, and could easily outclimb both the F4F Wildcat and the Curtiss P-40. Its range of more than
1200 miles was far superior to that of
any other Allied fighter then available. The tests also confirmed that the Zero was indeed the most maneuverable
carrier-based fighter in the world, and
that it was suicide to try and out-maneuver it, especially at low speed.
However, the maneuverability of the
Zero deteriorated rapidly as the speed increased. At high speeds, the ailerons stiffened and became extremely
difficult to move. In addition, tests
revealed that the wings had structural problems which prevented the Zero from being dived at high speeds. In combat, a
pursuing Zero could often be escaped by
diving at the maximum possible speed and by rolling either right or left, the Zero being unable to
follow. The rule for an Allied pilot
was to keep his speed as high as possible during combat and never, never
try to out-maneuver a Zero while at low
speed. The Zero Fighter lacked any
armor protection for the pilot, did not have any self-sealing fuel
tanks, and had no onboard fire
extinguishing equipment. A superficial hit would often cause the aircraft to catch fire.
The final air
battles fought by the A6M2 were on October 26, 1942 during the Battle of Santa Cruz. After that time, the A6M2 was
superseded by the A6M3 version of the
Reisen, and A6M2s were relegated to second-line units and training outfits. Many of these obsolete
A6M2s were brought back to operational
status and expended in kamikaze attacks in the last year of the war.
Specification
of A6M2 Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter Model 21:
One Nakajima
NK1C Sakae 12 fourteen cylinder air-cooled radial, rated at 940 hp for takeoff, 950 hp at 13,780
feet.
Performance:
Maximum speed 331 mph at 14,930 feet. Cruising speed 207 mph. Initial climb rate 4517 feet per
minute. Climb to 19,685 feet in 7
minutes 27 seconds. Service ceiling 32,810 feet. Normal range 1160
miles. Maximum range 1930 miles. Radius
of turn with entry speed of 230 mph was 1118 feet. Entering a 180 degree steep turn with an entry speed of 230 mph,
the fighter could complete the turn in
5.62 seconds, with an exit speed from the turn of 189 mph. At slower speeds, the turning radius was 612
feet. Normal positive g-load factor was
7g, with a safety factor of an additional 1.8g. Normal negative g-load factor was 3.5g, with a safety factor of an
extra 1.8g.
Dimensions:
Wingspan 39 feet 4 7/16 inches, length 29 feet 8 11/16 inches, height 10 feet 0 1/16 inches, wing
area 241.5 square feet. Weights: 3704
pounds empty, 5313 pounds loaded, 6164 pounds maximum. Fuel capacity:
Internal fuel capacity was 114 Imp
gall. One 72.6 Imp. gall drop tank could be carried underneath the fuselage. Armament: Two 7.7-mm Type 97 machine
guns in the fuselage decking and two
20-mm Type 99 cannon in the wings. Two
132-pound bombs could be carried on underwing racks.
A6M2-N "Rufe"
In the autumn
of 1940, anticipating the possibility
of a Pacific war against the United States, the Japanese Navy issued a 15-Shi specification for a
single-seat fighter seaplane that would
be capable of providing air cover for offensive amphibious operations in far-flung places where land bases were not
yet available. At that time, the
Japanese Army's Corps of Engineers was quite small and was ill-equipped
for the task of building airfields in
newly-conquered territories in a hurry.
The Kawanishi
Kokuki K.K. (Kawanishi Aircraft Co Ltd) began work on their N1K1 project to meet this requirement, but it soon became
obvious that this ambitious aircraft
would not be ready in time for the upcoming war with the USA. As a temporary alternative, the Japanese Navy ordered
the Nakajima Hikoki K.K. (Nakajima
Aeroplane Co Ltd) to begin work on a seaplane adaptation of the Mitsubishi A6M2 Reisen (Zero Fighter)
that Nakajima was also building.
Work on the
project began in February of 1941. The A6M2 Model 11 with the non-folding wingtips was used as the
basis. The retractable landing gear was
removed and the wheel wells were faired over. A large central float was mounted, attached to the belly of the
fuselage by means of a forward-sloping
pylon and an aft V-strut. Two stabilizing cantilever floats were fitted
underneath the outboard wings. The
standard powerplant and armament of the A6M2 were retained. In order to provide the additional aerodynamic
stability required by the presence of
the large float, the area of the vertical tail surfaces had to be increased and a small ventral fin was
added. Because the main pylon had taken
up the space previously reserved for the ventral drop tank, an auxiliary fuel tank was installed in the float itself.
The aircraft was designated A6M2-N.
The first
prototype A6M2-N was flown on December 7, 1941, the first day of the Pacific War. Production was
ordered under the designation Navy Type
2 Floatplane Fighter Model 11.
The first
production A6M2-N was delivered in April of 1942. The A6M2-N first appeared in combat in the Solomons. The A6M2-N was
given the Allied code name RUFE
under Capt Frank McCoy's system of assigning hillbilly names to Japanese aircraft. A6M2-Ns were initially
deployed to Tulagi, but were caught in
the raids leading up to the American landings on Guadalcanal. Although they inflicted some serious damage on the
B-17s of the 11th Bombardment Group,
these A6M2-Ns were soon destroyed.
The A6M2-N was
also used in the Aleutian campaign. In spite of the weight and drag of the float, the A6M2-N was actually quite fast
and maneuverable, and could even
out-maneuver many Allied fighters if they were unwise enough to try and dog-fight with this floatplane.
On several occasions, they succeeded in
scoring kills against aircraft as formidable as the P-38 Lightning.
As the war in
the Pacific progressed, the A6M2-N was encountered just about everywhere. However, by this time the
Japanese Navy had been thrown back onto
the defensive, and in this mode the A6M2-N was no match for the Allied
land-based fighters which opposed it. In spite of its obsolescence, the A6M2-N was still in service at Lake Biwa on
the Japanese island of Honshu, being
used primarily to train pilots for Kawanishi N1K1 Kyofu floatplane
fighters, but occasionally being called
up to act as an interceptor in the defense of
central Honshu.
A total of 327
A6M2-N floatplane fighters were built by Nakajima at the Koizumi plant between December 1941 and September 1943.
Specification
of Nakajima A6M2-N Navy Type 2 Floatplane Fighter Model 11:
One Nakajima
NK1C Sakae 12 fourteen cylinder air-cooled radial, rated at 940 hp for takeoff and 950 hp at 13,780
feet.
Performance:
Maximum speed 271 mph at 16,405 feet. Cruising speed 184 mph. Climb to 16.685 feet in 6 minutes 43
seconds. Service
ceiling 32,810 feet.
Norma range 715 miles, maximum range 1110 miles. Dimensions: Wingspan 39 feet 4 7/16 inches, length 33 feet 1 5/8
inches, height 14 feet 1 5/16 inches,
wing area 241.54 square feet. Weights: 4235
pounds empty, 5423 pounds loaded, 6349 pounds maximum. Armament: Two
7.7-mm Type 97 machine guns in upper
fuselage decking and two 20-mm Type 99 cannon in the wings. Two 132-pound bombs could be carried on external racks.
A6M2-K two-seat trainer
The A6M2-K was
a two-seat training version of the A6M2
Zero Fighter.
The 21st Naval
Air Arsenal at Sasebo converted a single A6M2 under a 17-Shi specification by fitting a two-seat cockpit, with student
pilot forward and instructor behind. An
enlarged canopy was fitted, which for some reason did not fully enclose the student's seat. The fuselage fuel tank
was removed, and the two 20-mm wing
guns were removed. Small horizontal fins were fitted on the side of the fuselage ahead of the
stabilizers for added stability. The main
wheel fairings were eliminated. The aircraft was designated A6M2-K.
Following naval
evaluation, it was ordered into production as the A6M2-K Zero-Rensen (Zero Fighter Trainer). Starting in November
1943, 236 A6M2-Ks were built by the
21st Naval Air Arsenal, and a further 272 were built from May 1944 at Hitachi's Chiba plant.
The A6M2-K
two-seaters were extensively operated in Japan and Formosa as advanced trainers. They were also
modified as target tugs by the removal
of the tail cone and the installation of a cable container underneath
each wing. Many were expended in
kamikaze attacks in the last few months of the war.
Specification
of A6M2-K:
One Nakajima
NK1C Sakae 12 fourteen cylinder air-cooled radial, rated at 940 hp for takeoff and 950 hp at 13,780
feet.
Performance:
Maximum speed 296 mph at 13,125 feet. Cruising speed 214 mph. Climb to 19,685 feet in 7 minutes 56
seconds. Service ceiling 33,400 feet.
Normal range 860 miles.
Dimensions:
Wingspan 39 feet 4 7/16 inches, length 30 feet 0 1/4 inches, height 11 feet 7 3/16 inches, wing area 241.54 square
feet. Weights: 4010 pounds empty, 5146
pounds loaded, 5792 pounds maximum. Fuel capacity: 83.6 Imp gall carried internally. Drop tank not
carried.
Armament: Two
7.7-mm Type 97 machine guns in upper fuselage decking. Two 132-pound bombs could be carried on underwing
racks.
A6M3 "Hap"
In mid-1941,
work began on a new version of the Zero
Fighter, the A6M3 powered by a 1130 hp Sakae 21. This engine was equipped with a two-speed supercharger
instead of a single-speed unit as used
on the earlier Sakae 12. The new engine required that the firewall be
moved 8 inches further aft, which
reduced the fuselage fuel capacity from 21.6
Imp gall to 13.2 Imp gall. The shape of the engine cowling had to be
changed in order to incorporate the
supercharger air intake in its upper lip.
The first A6M3
flew in June of 1941. Although the aircraft performed satisfactorily, the
flight trials of the A6M3 were somewhat
disappointing since performance figures fell below the calculated
values. In addition, production had to
be delayed until sufficient numbers of Sakae 21 engines became available.
The type was
placed in production as the Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter Model 32. Beginning with the fourth
aircraft, the ammunition supply for the wing-mounted 20-mm cannon was increased
from 60 rpg to 100 rpg. Soon
thereafter, in order to simplify production and maintenance, the folding
wingtips and the tab balances were
removed, reducing the wingspan to 36 feet 1 1/16 inches and wing area to 231.75 square feet. This resulted in a slight
increase in the level speed with little
adverse effect in the overall maneuverability.
Japanese pilots did find that both the maneuverability and climb rate of
the new clipped-wing Zero Fighter were
slightly poorer than those of the earlier A6M2, but the aircraft was considerably faster in a dive, the ailerons were
more effective, and the roll rate was
better at high speed.
343 A6M3s were
built by Mitsubishi, with an unspecified number also being built by Nakajima at Koizumi.
Following
limited service in Japan, the A6M3s were deployed to the New Guinea/Solomons area in the late spring
of 1942 in preparation for the invasion
of Australia. Initially, the Allies thought that the A6M3 was an entirely new fighter because of its
squared-off wingtips, and Capt. Frank McCoy's
team at the Directorate of Intelligence of the Allied Air Forces,
Southwest Pacific Area, assigned it the
code name HAP, after the nickname of General Henry Arnold, the USAAF's Chief of Staff. The General was not
amused, and had Capt. McCoy called onto
the carpet to explain just what he was up to.
Capt McCoy seems to have survived this particular episode, but the code
name of the new square-winged fighter
was quietly changed to HAMP. When Allied intelligence finally recognized
that the aircraft was not a new design
but was actually a modified version of the ZEKE, it was renamed ZEKE 32.
Following the
American landing at Guadalcanal, the A6M3 were forced to operate from bases 560 nautical miles away from the landing
force. During this operation, a large
number of A6M3s were lost because they had
insufficient range. The Sakae 21 engine of the A6M3 had a higher fuel
consumption rate than the Sakae 12, and
this, acting in concert with the reduced fuel capacity resulting from the installation of the
two-speed supercharger, had an adverse
effect on range, which had been one of the strong points of the A6M2. In order to increase the range, a 9.9 Imp gall
fuel tank was fitted in each wing
outboard of the cannon. The folding wingtips were restored. This new
version was still known under the short
designation A6M3, but bore the new designation of Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter Model 22. It could be externally
distinguished from earlier A6M3 models
by the rounded-off wingtips. The aircraft was known as the Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter Model 22A when long-barreled
20-mm Type 99 Model 2 Mk 3 cannon were
installed. The rounded-wingtip Model 22 became the prime carrier fighter of the A6M3 series, some 560 being built by
Mitsubishi.
Specification
of A6M3 Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter Model 32:
One Nakajima
NK1F Sakae 21 fourteen cylinder air-cooled radial, rated at 1130 hp for takeoff, 1100 hp at 9350
feet, 980 hp at 19,685 feet.
Performance:
Maximum speed 338 mph at 19,685 feet. Cruising speed 230 mph. Initial climb rate 4500 feet per
minute. Radius of turn with entry speed
at 230 mph was 1118 feet. Entering a 180 degree steep turn with an entry
speed of 230 mph, the fighter could
complete
the turn in
6.02 seconds, with an exit speed from the turn of 189 mph. At slower speed, the radius of turn was 629 feet. Climb to
19,685 feet in 7 minutes 19 seconds.
Service ceiling 36,250 feet. Maximum range 1477 miles.
Dimensions:
Wingspan 36 feet 1 1/16 inches, length 29 feet 8 11/16 inches, height 11 feet 6 5/32 inches, wing
area 231.75 square feet. Weights: 3984
pounds empty, 5609 pounds loaded.
Armament: Two
7.7-mm Type 97 machine guns in the upper fuselage decking and two 20-mm Type 99 cannon in the wings. A 72.6-Imp
gall drop tank could be carried
underneath the fuselage.
A6M4
By late 1942
and early 1943, the Zero Fighter was
beginning to be confronted with newer, more-capable Allied fighters. At high altitude, the A6M2 and A6M3 were
hopelessly outclassed by newer Allied
fighters such as the P-38 Lightning and the F4U Corsair. In an attempt
to correct this deficiency, two A6M2s
were modified by Dai-Ichi Kaigun Koku Gijitsusho at Yokosuka to take an experimental turbosupercharged Sakae
engine. The short designation A6M4 was
assigned to this project.
However, major
teething troubles were encounted with the A6M4, and no production order was placed. As a
substitute, the A6M5 interim version
was introduced pending availability of the A7M Reppu.
A6M5
By early 1943,
the war was beginning to go badly for
the Japanese, and new, more capable Allied fighters such as the Lockheed P-38 Lightning and the Vought
F4U Corsair had begun to appear. The
Lockheed P-38 Lightning was introduced into combat in the Aleutian theatre in August of 1942 and in the New
Guinea theatre in the autumn of 1942. The
P-38 had an excellent high-altitude performance, a high diving speed,
and heavy armament. The US Navy introduced
the Vought F4U Corsair in combat on February 13, 1943 during a raid on Bougainville. This fighter had high top
speed, good diving performances, rugged
construction, heavy armament, and good protection for the pilot and fuel tank. With these two American fighters
committed to combat in large
quantities, the Zero began to lose control of the air.
One of the
primary weaknesses of the early Reisen was its
insufficient diving speed, with less-maneuverable Allied fighters often
being able to engage the Zero
successfully in a diving encounter or else being able to escape destruction by diving to safety, the Zero
being unable to follow. This forced the
Japanese Navy to consider the development of an improved version of the
Reisen, since the hoped-for generation
of new fighter aircraft had yet to materialize. The A6M5 Model 52 was the result.
In the pursuit
of better combat capability (especially a higher diving speed), the 904th Reisen (an A6M3) was converted as a
prototype for what was to become the
A6M5 series. This project was supervised by engineer Mijiro Takahashi, who had
taken over development of the Zero from Jiro
Horikoshi so that the latter could concentrate on the J2M Raiden
interceptor. The converted aircraft was
fitted with a new set of wings with heavier gauge skin and with redesigned, non-folding rounded wingtips.
The wingspan was reduced to 36 feet 1
1/16 inches and wing area to 229.3 square feet. The standard A6M3 armament of two 20-mm cannon and two 7.7-mm
machine guns was retained, as were the
two wing tanks and the Sakae 21 engine. However, new individual exhaust
stacks were fitted to the cylinder
heads, which added some residual thrust.
The first A6M5
flew in August of 1943. In spite of an increase in all-up weight of 440 pounds, the A6M5 was faster than the A6M3
Model 32, and could reach a maximum
level speed of 351 mph at 19,685 feet.
More important,
it could now be dived at speeds of up to 410 mph. It was rushed into production as the Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter
Model 52.
The Model 52
began to reach front line units in the autumn of 1943. It was immediately confronted by the new
Grumman F6F Hellcat, which was slightly
less maneuverable but which was much more strongly built, heavier armed,
and better protected.
The A6M5 saw
its first major action in June of 1944 with the Allied invasions of the Marianas. On June 19, 1944,
a fleet of dive bombers and torpedo
bombers escorted by 108 A6M5s attempted to attack Admiral Raymond A.
Spruance's Task Force 58. The attacking
force was decimated by intercepting F6F
Hellcats, and those planes that managed to get through found it almost
impossible to penetrate the heavy
screen of anti-aircraft fire. The Japanese attack force lost some 300 aircraft that day in what was later
to be known as the "Marianas Turkey
Shoot". Losses were so devastating that the Japanese navy was never
able again to mount any sort of sizable
offensive air action.
Despite the
fact that the Zero Fighter was by now outclassed by Allied fighters such as the Grumman F6F Hellcat and the Vought
F4U Corsair, the A6M5 became
numerically the most important Japanese fighter and was the version of the Reisen built in the largest
numbers. Since Japanese industry was
unable to come up with sufficient numbers of higher-performing
replacements, the manufacture of the A6M5 series continued until the end of the
Pacific War. Mitsubishi built 747 Model
52s. Nakajama also built the the Model 52
during 1943-44 --- the exact number is not known --- and Hitachi was
also scheduled to build the A6M5, but
production snags prevented that company from
completing even a single example before the war ended in August of 1945.
Among the field
modifications carried out to A6M5s was the addition of a 20-mm cannon mounted to fire obliquely upward at an angle of
30 degrees from a position behind the
pilot's cockpit. These fighters were intended as B-29 Superfortress interceptors.
Some A6M5s were
converted to dive bombers by replacing the centerline drop tank by a rack for a single 550-pound bomb. Unfortunately,
the rack was mechanically unreliable, and frequently failed to release its bomb
when commanded to do so by the pilot. Consequently, many Zero dive bombers were forced to fly back to their bases with
their bombs still attached, and many
were forced to ditch at sea and were lost.
This was of
course not a problem for those A6M5s that were used for kamikaze attacks. Modified Zeros assigned to
Air Group 201 based in the Philippines
carried out the first suicide missions against American naval units. The first such attack was carried out on October
25, 1944, led by Lt Yukio Seki. These
suicide aircraft were at first primarily modified obsolete A6M2s, but modified A6M5s were later used as well.
These attacks were an outstanding
success, and other Kamikaze units were formed, primarily equipped with
Zero fighters modified to carry 500-lb
bombs underneath their fuselages. In ten months of use, suicide aircraft accounted for nearly half
of all US warships damaged.
Nevertheless, the desperate Kamikaze attacks were not able to stop the
relentless American advance across the
Pacific to Japan.
Specification
of A6M5 Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter Model 52:
One Mitsubishi
NK1F Sakae 21 fourteen cylinder air-cooled radial, rated at 1130 hp for takeoff, 1100 hp at 9350 feet, 980 hp at
19,685 feet.
Performance:
Maximum speed 351 mph at 19,685 feet. Cruising speed 230 mph. Climb to 19.685 feet in 7 minutes 1
second. Service ceiling 38,520 feet.
Maximum range 1171 miles at a cruising speed of 230 mph.
Dimensions:
Wingspan 36 feet 1 1/16 inches, length 29 feet 11 3/32 inches, height 11 feet 6 5/32 inches, wing
area 229.27 square feet. Weights: 4136
pounds empty, 6025 pounds loaded.
Armament: Two
7.7-mm Type 97 machine guns in the upper fuselage decking and two 20-mm Type 99 cannon in the wings. Two 132-lb
bombs could be carried on underwing
racks.
A6M5a
In response to
a need for heavier firepower and even
better diving performance, the A6M5a version of the Zero Fighter was produced. The A6M5a Model 52A
appeared in late 1943 and began rolling
off the production lines at Mitsubishi and Nakajima in March of 1944. It
had still heavier gauge wing skin which
enable a further increase in diving speed
to 460 mph, bringing it almost up to Western standards. This was to be
the highest diving speed attained by
any Reisen variant. Armament was improved by
replacing the drum fed Type 99 Model 2 Mk3 cannon with 100 rpg with
belt-fed 20-mm Type 99 Model 2 Mk4
cannon with 125 rpg.
Delivery of the
Model 52A began in March of 1944. Mitsubishi built 391 Model 52As. Nakajima also produced the type, but I don't know
the actual number built.
Specification
of A6M5a Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter Model 52a:
One Mitsubishi
NK1F Sakae 21 fourteen cylinder air-cooled radial, rated at 1130 hp for takeoff, 1100 hp at 9350 feet, 980 hp at
19,685 feet.
Performance:
Maximum speed 348 mph at 19,685 feet. Cruising speed 230 mph. Climb to 19.685 feet in 7 minutes 1
second. Service ceiling 38,520 feet.
Maximum range 1195 miles at a cruising speed of 230 mph. Dimensions:
Wingspan 36 feet 1 1/16 inches, length
29 feet 11 3/32 inches, height 11 feet 6 5/32
inches, wing area 229.27 square feet. Weights: 4167 pounds empty, 6047
pounds loaded.
Armament: Two
7.7-mm Type 97 machine guns in the upper fuselage decking and two 20-mm Type 99 cannon in the wings. Two 132-lb
bombs could be carried on underwing
racks.
A6M5b
Since the J2M
Raiden interceptor and the A7M Reppu
carrier-based fighter programs had run into delays, the Japanese Navy had no alternative but to continue with
progressive developments of the Reisen,
which was by now thoroughly outclassed by more modern Allied warplanes.
One of the
weaknesses of the Zero Fighter was its lack of any protection for its fuel tanks, which made it prone to catching
fire even when only superficially damaged in combat. In addition, the excellent maneuverability and good climbing
performance of the Zero Fighter had been achieved to a certain extent at the expense of the
omission of armor protection for the pilot,
which became more and more of a serious problem as the war continued.
The A6M5b Model
52B originated as a private venture jointly developed by Mitsubishi and Dai-Ichi Kaigun Kokusho to carry additional
armament and to provide some fire
protection for the fuel tanks and some armor
protection for the pilot. Armored glass was provided for the windshield,
which consisted of two layers of
plastic mounted between glass outer-sections. The total armored windshield was two inches thick. The
fuel tanks were provided with automatic
CO2-type fire extinguishers. One of the fuselage-mounted 7.7-mm Type 97 machine guns was replaced by a 13.2-mm Type
3 machine gun.
Production of
the Model 52B began at Mitsubishi's 3rd airframe plant in April of 1944, and 470 fighters of this
type were built. This version was
perhaps the best version of the Reisen to see active duty. The Model 52B
was available in time for the US Navy's
amphibious operations to capture the Marianas in preparation for the B-29
offensive against Japan. However, the Model 52B was no match for the F6F Hellcat, and dozens were lost on June
19, 1944 during what came to be known
as the "Marianas Turkey Shoot".
Mitsubishi
built 470 Model 52Bs.
Specification
of A6M5b Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter Model 52B:
One Mitsubishi
NK1F Sakae 21 fourteen cylinder air-cooled radial, rated at 1130 hp for takeoff, 1100 hp at 9350 feet, 980 hp at
19,685 feet.
Dimensions:
Wingspan 36 feet 1 1/16 inches, length 29 feet 11 3/32 inches, height 11 feet 6 5/32 inches, wing
area 229.27 square feet. Armament: One
7.7-mm Type 97 machine gun and one 13.2-mm Type 3 machine gun in the upper fuselage decking and two 20-mm Type 99
cannon in the wings. Two 132-lb bombs
could be carried on underwing racks.
A6M5c
Despite the
obsolescence of the basic design,
development of the Reisen continued into the summer of 1944. About a month after the Marianas disaster, on July
23, 1944, the Japanese Navy issued
another Zero Fighter improvement order. This time the Navy demanded Zero
Fighters with even more armor,
armament, fuel tankage, and bomb delivery capability. The A6M5c was the result.
Design engineer
Eitaro Sano headed up the Mitsubishi team. The A6M5c Model 52C differed from earlier Zero Fighters in having two
additional 13.2-mm machine guns
installed in the wings outboard of the cannon. The fuselage-mounted 13.2-mm machine gun was retained, but the
smaller-calibre 7.7-mm fuselage-mounted
gun was deleted. An armor plate was mounted behind the pilot's seat to provide some protection against attacks from
the rear, and a 30.8 Imp gall
self-sealing fuel tank was installed behind the cockpit. Wing racks were
provided for unguided air-to-air
rockets.
The Zero
Fighter was now beginning to suffer from the disease which had affected lots of other fighters --- a
steady increase in the weight caused by
the addition of more fuel, armament, and armor without a corresponding increase in engine power. Sano now felt that
the Sakae radial would be
insufficiently powerful, and recommended that the Sakae engine be
replaced by the more powerful
Mitsubishi Kinsei 62 engine. However, the Navy refused to allow this and ordered Mitsubishi to retain the Sakae
radial. Nevertheless, they did allow
Mitsubishi to use the improved Sakae 31 with water-methanol injection in
the A6M5c. However, this engine was not
available in time for installation in
production A6M5c fighters, and so they had to rely on the Sakae 21 engine.
The first A6M5c
was obtained by modifying an A6M5 airframe, and took off on its flrst flight in September of 1944. During flight
testing, it was found necessary to
increase the thickness of the wing covering in the region of the gun bays in order to achieve the
desired diving performance. The design
was put into production as the Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter Model 52C.
The
self-sealing tanks planed for the Model 52C were not actually fitted to production aircraft because of the
lack of experience of ground crews in
dealing with this type of fuel tank. As expected, the increased weight
proved to be too much for the power
available from the Sakae 21, and the performance of the A6M5c was disappointing. Consequently, production of the
Model 52C was terminated after the
delivery of only 93 machines.
Specification
of A6M5c Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter Model 52C:
One Mitsubishi
NK1F Sakae 21 fourteen cylinder air-cooled radial, rated at 1130 hp for takeoff, 1100 hp at 9350 feet, 980 hp at
19,685 feet.
Performance:
Maximum speed 348 mph at 19,685 feet. Cruising speed 230 mph. Climb to 16,405 feet in 5 minutes 50
seconds. Service ceiling 36,255 feet.
Maximum range 1314 miles at a cruising speed of 230 mph.
Dimensions:
Wingspan 36 feet 1 1/16 inches, length 29 feet 11 3/32 inches, height 11 feet 6 5/32 inches, wing
area 229.27 square feet. Weights: 4751
pounds empty, 6945 pounds loaded.
Armament: one
13.2-mm Type 3 machine gun in the upper fuselage decking, two wing-mounted 13.2-mm Type 3 machine guns and two
wing-mounted 20-mm Type 99 cannon.
A6M5-K two-seat trainer
The A6M5-K
Model 22 was a two-seat tandem advanced
fighter trainer version of the basic A6M5. It
was similar to the A6M2-K, a two-seat adaptation of the earlier A6M2.
The Sasebo
Naval Air Arsenal undertook the project design, and work on the prototypes began in August of 1944.
Production was to be carried out by
Hitachi, but only a small experimental batch of seven A6M5-Ks were built
in March of 1945. By this time, the
deteriorating course of the Pacific War had
placed emphasis on combat aircraft, and no more two-seat A6M5-Ks were
built.
A6M6c
The A6M6c was
the next variant of the Zero Fighter.
The A6M6c was powered by the water-methanol boosted Sakae 31 engine, which finally became available in
November of 1944. The Sakae 31 had the
same rated horsepower as the Sakae 21, but had a water-methanol
injection system for short bursts of
speed. The aircraft was otherwise similar to the A6M5c, but it did have self-sealing wing tanks
substituted for the
previously-unprotected tanks.
One prototype
of the A6M6c was built by Mitsubishi in late 1944, but the production of the A6M6c Model 53C was
assigned to Nakajima at the Koizuma
plant. A small quantity of A6M6c fighters were turned out by Nakajima, the exact number being unknown.
Although a
maximum speed of 346 mph could be achieved with the Sakae 31 engine, the actual performance was
usually below this because of poor
quality control in the manufacture of the engine and airframe. In
addition, the Sakae 31 engine did not
produced the expected boosted power and the injection system was troublesome and difficult to maintain.
Specification
of A6M6c Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter Model 52C:
One Mitsubishi
NK1F Sakae 31 fourteen cylinder air-cooled radial, rated at 1130 hp for takeoff, 1100 hp at 9350 feet, 980 hp at
19,685 feet.
Performance:
Maximum speed 337 mph at 21,000 feet. Cruising speed 230 mph. Climb to 26,250 feet in 9 minutes 53
seconds. Service ceiling 33,300 feet.
Maximum range 956 miles at a cruising speed of 230 mph.
Dimensions:
Wingspan 36 feet 1 1/16 inches, length 29 feet 11 3/32 inches, height 11 feet 6 5/32 inches, wing
area 229.27 square feet. Weights: 4519
pounds empty, 6614 pounds loaded.
Armament: One
13.2-mm Type 3 machine gun in the upper fuselage decking, two wing-mounted 13.2-mm Type 3 machine guns and two
wing-mounted 20-mm Type 99 cannon.
Eight 22-lb rockets or two 132-lb rockets could be carried underneath the wing.
A6M7 dive bomber
By late 1944,
most of the larger Japanese aircraft
carriers had been sunk, and the Japanese Navy
instructed Mitsubishi to begin development of a version of the Reisen
capable of being used as a dive bomber
operating from smaller aircraft carriers. The A6M7 was designed to meet this requirement.
The A6M7
differed from the A6M6c in having the under-fuselage drop tank installation replaced by a special bomb
rack capable of carrying a single 551
pound or 1100 pound bomb. A strengthened and reinforced tailplane was provided to accommodate the stresses of dive
bombing. In place of the centerline
drop tank, provisions were made for two 77 Imp gall drop tanks to be
attached underneath the wings outboard
of the 13.2-mm machine guns.
Production of
the A6M7 began as the Model 63 in May of 1945. It was hastily produced both by Mitsubishi and
Nakajima and issued to Navy dive-bomber
units. The exact numbers built by either company is not known. The
bomb-release mechanism proved to be
more reliable than the makeshift racks fitted in the field to earlier Zero Fighters that often failed to release
their bombs. This problem did not of
course affect the Zeros that were expended in
Kamikaze attacks. Some of the A6M7s were also expended in this fashion
in the closing months of the Pacific
War.
Specification
of A6M7 Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter Model 63:
One Mitsubishi
NK1F Sakae 31 fourteen cylinder air-cooled radial, rated at 1130 hp for takeoff, 1100 hp at 9350 feet, 980 hp at
19,685 feet.
Dimensions:
Wingspan 36 feet 1 1/16 inches, length 29 feet 11 3/32 inches, height 11 feet 6 5/32 inches, wing
area 229.27 square feet. Weights: 6945
pounds loaded.
Armament: One
13.2-mm Type 3 machine gun in the upper fuselage decking, two wing-mounted 13.2-mm Type 3 machine guns and two
wing-mounted 20-mm Type 99 cannon. One
551-lb or 1102-lb bomb could be carried underneath the fuselage centerline. Two 77-Imp gall
droptanks could be carried underneath the
wings.
A6M8
The A6M8 was
the last production version of the
Reisen. Bomb damage to the Nakajima engine plants (as well as Nakajima's decision to decrease Sakae
production in preparation for the production
of the 18-cylinder Homare radial) had resulted in a shortage of the
Sakae radial engines which had
previously powered the Zero Fighter. Consequently, the Navy finally accepted Mitsubishi's proposal
to use their more powerful MK8K Kinsei
62 (Ha-33/62) fourteen-cylinder air-cooled radial engine.
Manufacture of
the Kinsei-powered A6M8 prototypes was finally
approved in November 1944. The forward fuselage was completely
redesigned to accommodate the 1560 hp
Mitsubishi MK8P Kinsei 62, which had a larger diameter than the Sakae, requiring that the fuselage-mounted
gun be removed. At the same time, the
fuel tank fire-extinguishing system was improved, and additional fuel
tankage was added. The fuselage
centerline could carry a single 1100-lb bomb, and a pair of 77-Imp gall drop tanks could be carried underneath the
wings.
The first A6M8
was completed in April of 1945. Flight tests turned up a number of faults in the fuel and oil
systems, plus a tendency to overheat,
and the machine had to be returned to the factory for these to be
corrected. By enlarging the oil tank,
revising the pipe lines, and by fitting engine
cooling baffles, these snags were eliminated. At high altitudes, the
tendency for the fuel pressure to drop
was overcome by altering the fuel regulating
valve.
After
completion of service trials at Aomori, on May 25, 1945 the A6M8 was approved for manufacture as the
Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter Model 64. A
second prototype was accepted in June, and both were turned over to
the Yokosuka Experimental Air Corps
Proving Division throughout July.
Production of
the A6M8 was assigned to dispersed Mitsubishi and Nakajima factories, with as many as 6300 machines being ordered.
However, owing to the chaotic
conditions prevailing in Japanese industry in the closing months of the war, none were actually delivered.
Specification
of A6M8 Navy Type 0 Carrier Fighter Model 64:
One Mitsubishi
MK8P Kinsei 62 fourteen cylinder air-cooled radial, rated at 1560 hp for takeoff, 1340 hp at 6890 feet, 1180 hp at
19,030 feet.
Performance:
Maximum speed 356 mph at 19,685 feet. Climb to 16.685 feet in 6 minutes 50 seconds. Service ceiling 37,075 feet. Dimensions:
Wingspan 36 feet 1 1/16 inches, length
30 feet 3 21/32 inches, height 11 feet 11 7/32
inches, wing area 229.27 square feet. Weights: 4740 pounds empty, 6945
pounds loaded.
Armament: Two
13.2-mm Type 3 machine guns and two 20-mm Type 99 cannon in the wings. A single 1100-lb bomb could be carried
underneath the fuselage centerline. An additional two 132-lb bombs could be
carried underneath the wings.
Sources:
·
Japanese Aircraft of the Pacific War, Rene J.
Francillon, Naval Institute Press, 1979.
·
Famous Fighters of the Second World War, William Green,
Doubleday, 1967.
·
Zero Fighter, Martin Caidin, Ballantine, 1970.
·
War Planes of the Second World War, Fighters, Volume 3,
William Green, Doubleday 1964.
·
The Mitsubishi A6M2 Zero-Sen, Rene J. Francillon,
Aircraft in Profile, Doubleday, 1969.
·
Mitsubishi A6M5 to A6M8 Zero-Sen, M.C. Richards and
Donald S. Smith, Aircraft in Profile,
Doubleday, 1974.
Joe Baugher
jfb@ihgp.ih.att.com